On 30.11.18 01:34, Francesco Ariis wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 03:41:12PM -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > > I am curious to know in what context "someone" felt it would make a > > difference. > > I suspect work related setting. Cc: is indeed "being kept in the loop" > while To: is "addressed specifically". > > I have never noticed mutt behaviour, but the above seems a sensible > behaviour.
+1 Spontaneous increase of entropy isn't usually user-friendly. If I hadn't retired ten years ago, it'd make more of a difference here, but letting the CC list know they can leave the message on the back burner is fractionally as important as signalling the TO recipients that they can't. Erik