Hello, Remco. On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 06:23:28 -0500, Remco Rijnders wrote: > On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 11:17:05AM +0000, Alan wrote in > <X/L5MfvPErhnbm7P@ACM>: > >I've just had a look at my (mbox) spool file with
> > $ tail -n5000 Mail/spool | less > >. The dates I see there are 2021. > >Maybe this has been fixed in 2.0.3. I'll wait for Gentoo's release > >cycle to catch up with 2.0.3/4. > For what it is worth, I can't think of a single reason or recent change why > mutt > would display such a thing. Can you give an example of any such entry that you > are seeing? I'm now seeing dates from 4 January as 2021, those of 3 January and before as 2020. It is almost as though some piece of software thinks the year begins on 4th Jan, not 1st Jan. Here's a short section of my inbox, with mails from various time zones straddling midnight: 164997 Os 3 Jan 2020 Michael ( 92 / 3.5K) └─> 164998 N 4 Jan 2021 Dr Rainer Woito ( 45 / 1.4K) └─> 164999 Ns 4 Jan 2021 Michael ( 72 / 2.9K) └─> 165000 O 3 Jan 2020 Daniel Martín ( 110 / 4.3K) [PATCH] Fix some failing tests in BSD systems 165001 O 3 Jan 2020 Eli Zaretskii ( 21 / 0.9K) ├─> 165002 N 3 Jan 2020 Daniel Martín ( 94 / 3.9K) │ ├─> 165003 N 4 Jan 2021 Dmitry Gutov ( 11 / 0.4K) │ └─> 165004 N 4 Jan 2021 Eli Zaretskii ( 21 / 0.8K) │ └─> 165005 N 4 Jan 2021 Dmitry Gutov ( 49 / 1.8K) └─> 165006 N 3 Jan 2020 Stefan Monnier ( 11 / 0.3K) └─> 165007 O 3 Jan 2020 Glenn Morris ( 9 / 0.2K) Re: master 64f2c96 2/2: Make a process test faster. 165008 N + 3 Jan 2020 MAILER-DAEMON@m ( 48 / 1.7K) failure notice 165009 N 3 Jan 2020 Sheena Thomas (12850 / 963K) Happy New Year 165010 N 4 Jan 2021 Basil L. Contov ( 46 / 1.1K) Re: master d3d60ab: Remove unnecessary dependency on seq library 165011 N 3 Jan 2020 Mark Oteiza ( 21 / 0.5K) └─> 165012 N 4 Jan 2021 Bertram Scharpf ( 45 / 1.6K) [gentoo-user] Yet another USE flag problem 165013 N 4 Jan 2021 Arve Barsnes ( 9 / 0.3K) └─> > The only thing that comes to my mind right now is maybe you have a > format set that cuts the date displayed short, so that Jan 2021 gets > displayed as "Jan 20" and you didn't notice it before as that would > have been correct in the past year. Thanks for the suggestion, but my year display is of all 4 digits (a Y2K problem veteran :-). > I don't think mutt 2.0.3/4 will make a difference for you here. I admit I'm mystified as to what exactly could be causing this. > Kind regards, > Remco -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
