On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 01:03:35PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote: > > And to think of it, I'm starting to feel the same about Re and its > > siblings as I do about the tags. With any decent MUA you know that > > the article is a reply or followup by its position in the > > thread. So Re is just for the same foolish systems that need the > > tags in Subject because they can't tell it's a list thread.
> Well. I am blind and, the last time I tried enablign the thread > support in Mutt it made the display very "graphical", to render the > tree structure of a thread I think. I have accessibility issues of my own, so I definitely get your point and I'll think hard about it. (This article has the conventional prefix by a special dispensation.) In fact I also wish that mutt had at least an option to do like Gnus and indicate thread structure *only* by indentation, omitting the ASCII art. Right now I have a workaround, namely using really low contrast attributes for those characters, but I understand that might not help you. Can I make this a feature request? -- Ian
