On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 07:51:13 EST, MVallevand wrote: > On 1/7/07, Oliver von Bueren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Funny the 20070107 us slower. But I noticed a file size jump from 2.8MB > > 20061220 to 3.1MB for 20061222. Could that be some big change having an > > impact here? > > There are definitely problems for me with the post 3.2 releases and > cifs. Every time I begin to access a file from a symbolic link from > the mvp filesystem to a cifs share I get a kernel oops with a message > written to the logs but mvpmc itself doesn't seem to be affected . I > haven't tried any performance tests yet. This is probably more due to > the use of shared libraries then the file size (dropbear, > fuse/fusermount and shared libraries caused the size increase), > > Martin
What does the kernel oops look like? Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Mvpmc-users mailing list Mvpmc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mvpmc-users mvpmc wiki: http://mvpmc.wikispaces.com/
