On 2/2/07, DB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to note that I ended up having to use tftp port 69 rather than > 16869 as documented in the wiki.
That's normal for the previous revision. > I am having some problems with stability and configuration. Before going > into all of that, am I wasting my time trying to get a device that is as old > as this to work and should I just use it the way it is (which is usable > while a little flaky) or will it be worthwhile persuing this effort? I have several mvps, but no D1's, but I don't think that you be wasting your time trying to improve stability. If you are experiencing colour saturation issues that is another story. This all being said there is more to being an old machine then revision numbers and these machines will one day wear out (and I'm not looking forward to this). Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Mvpmc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mvpmc-users mvpmc wiki: http://mvpmc.wikispaces.com/
