Anyone have any thoughts? Neal seems to not understand my main point that if I have two tasks, and they are in all ways identical, but one I give a start days say of yesterday, and a due date of in 2 days, that that task, that I KNOW I want to already be working on TODAY has a lower ranking than a task with all default settings.
This to me is not logical (it has nothing to do with how ´I´ want it as Neal seems to think) as I have said nothing about wanting to be working on the task with no dates, yet MLO priority says this ´no date ´ task has a higher priority in regard to what I should be working on. How can a task with fixed date, in particular one in the past, have a lower rating than one with no fixed date (given all else is equal). To be clear(er), I do not, and do not want to, assign start dates to all my task, only to one that I know will take me some time to complete, so I want to be sure I start early enough. PS: Neal, I am not upset about anything, except maybe your condescending attitude -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
