Hi Christoph, The approach use is to make sure the views I use to see a prioritized list exclude tasks that have no DueDate defined.
Terry On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 1:20:45 PM UTC-4, Christoph wrote: > > In principle, I really like the idea behind the "computed-score > priority" feature. > > However, the way how due dates are factored into the computed score > seems wrong to me. > > When I set a due date in the future (maybe next week), then the computed > score gets a negative contribution. When the due date is set in the past > (overdue task), then the score gets a positive contribution (and there > is an option to boost that even more). So far, so good. > > However, when I set NO due date at all, then there is no contribution. > So this means that such tasks have higher priority than tasks with a due > date. Why should a task with no due date have higher priority than a > task due tomorrow? When I set no due date then this means for me "I have > no fixed date when to finish this task, it may be done any time". The > tasks that are due tomorrow should always have higher priority. > > -- Christoph > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mylifeorganized+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/9adad127-b98d-400b-95d3-b95176ce48ad%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
