Related to the term: if the "Dashboard" feature is simply included as default visualisation feature in the main middle canvas, then the naming problem simply goes away ;). And if the linkage of sub-areas is added you get an enhanced workspace feature.
=== the Aging feature: - intent: see the tasks/deliverables by time-flow - back and forward - solution: create a view and group the tasks by some time attribute (complete, changed, due, ..) without hierarchy by time Currently already possible. But not differentiated enough, as after the next month all the rest of time is simply future or past... which is a good start, but not sufficient for longterm planning. If there was more grouping done, this would be a great enhancement if one focuses on more distant things - or even the life past history or vision for the future. For both aspects i have defined specific flags for filtering and viewing / creating insights. More groups would be very very helpful - like: - next month - next quarter - 1,2,3 quarters - back or forth - next year - next 5 years - next decade same applied for past. If the grouping intervall was configurable in terms of days to group by in growing distance - even better :). does this make the idea clearer? thx -Alexander ric...@rcollings.co.uk schrieb am Donnerstag, 12. Januar 2023 um 15:22:39 UTC+1: > Agree with virtually all of the first two paragraphs. > > > > I have yet to start using ‘Dashboards’ (I also don’t like the term but > can’t think of a better one - perhaps ‘Task Organiser’ or ‘Task Board’ or > ‘Task Organiser’?) but feel quite excited about the possibilities as I > think they have the potential to address a criticism that others have made > of MLO which is that it is difficult to get an overview of everything you > have to do when you are working on lots of different things (which is why I > end up using Trello as well as MLO). > > > > I have from time to time asked for a ‘Lists’ capability such as one gets > in Trello (and which is fundamental to a Kanban board). It looks as if one > might be able to do this with a ‘Dashboard’ but I need to experiment. > > > > I am also interested in the ‘aging feature request’ idea – I am not quite > sure what this means but I think I have a similar need. Can you explain > a bit more Alexander? > > > > Richard > > > > *From:* mylifeo...@googlegroups.com <mylifeo...@googlegroups.com> *On > Behalf Of *deug...@gmail.com > *Sent:* 12 January 2023 09:49 > *To:* MyLifeOrganized <mylifeo...@googlegroups.com> > *Subject:* [MLO] Re: Dashboard vs Split Views > > > > actually i like the idea behind the dashboard thing - the name is > misleading however. > > > > If you combine relevant (different) views in one mega-view for handling > the same thing from different viewpoints at the same time - makes a lot of > sense. > > But the name Dashboard suggests some kind of metrics for measuring of > progress - to me at least. > > So if the name was something like "perspective"s or something alike would > be easier to get the idea by name :). > > ideas for improvements: > > - ability to automatically sync between the different areas - but > configurable, not just synched. By this you could have two areas linked and > some others just available for "thinking" > > > > now extending on the idea of a real dashboard.. > > - if there was an option available to have the same areas for task > navigation - cool > > - but added other real-dashboardy areas where some aggregate-functions of > attributes of the tasks would be computed into an aggregate > red/yellow/green indicator to start with > > - - the you could view different progress areas by navigating the "normal" > area while the "dashboardy" area in the overall Dashboard was "working" > > > > lastly my aging feature request ;) - better more differenciated groupings > for time oriented views - best configurable. > > > > just some thoughts. Glad to add more details if appreciated. > > > > -Alexander > > > > br...@hostland.com schrieb am Sonntag, 8. Januar 2023 um 20:05:32 UTC+1: > > I upgraded to v6, but the dashboard seems pointless. Who needs another > window to deal with and as other users have mentioned, the functionality is > extremely limited. > > > > Something much more useful would be split views. You could create a split > view using an editor similar to the dashboard editor. Instead of opening in > a separate window, the split view would open in a tab. It would provide the > full functionality of adding/editing tasks within each pane. So it would be > two (or more) views combined into a single tab. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MyLifeOrganized" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to mylifeorganiz...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/27d5c54e-88d2-4478-8c41-5162ffdb6ef4n%40googlegroups.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/27d5c54e-88d2-4478-8c41-5162ffdb6ef4n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mylifeorganized+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/f945faa9-91e0-4ea0-b123-a360fe364c1fn%40googlegroups.com.
