[let's drop integrators from the list, follow ups to incubator only]
On Aug 12, 2011, at 2:36 AM, Jan Mauersberger wrote:
>
>
> thanks for the hints and all the information. I finally managed to get my
> bridge working and to see my objects in the context tree so I don't think it
> was a complete waste of time but rather a good lesson to understand mylyn
> context stuff. I'm now prepared to join the collaboration :-)
Yes, totally. I was in the same boat as well.
>
> I was observing the code initially contributed by Benjamin to
> http://git.eclipse.org/c/mylyn/org.eclipse.mylyn.incubator.git so I did not
> recognize any updates. I will check
> https://github.com/MilesParker/mylyn.incubator instead, thanks Benjamin.
Yes, we're looking at moving that over too EclipseLabs git, but let me know if
you want to commit to my fork.
>
>> [...]
>>
>> http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-integrators/msg00922.html
>> http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-incubator-dev/msg00006.html
>>
>> Naturally Integrators is the one Mylyn list that I didn't sign up to follow
>> :), so I missed your message here. Please follow-up on incubator list since
>> that is where the EMF bridge work is happening.
>
> I tried to register to the incubator list but got a Mail Man error page :-( I
> will try later again...
That's pretty funny, the same thing happened to me when I tried to answer you
on integrators. https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=353378
>
>> [...] Perhaps you'd like to take that on?
>>
>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=343200
>>
> Well, give me some time to dive into the code ... afterwards,? No objection.
SOrry it is still such a moving target. In particular I'm mucking with a lot of
the diagram stuff right now. Anyway, whatever works for you. Or if you see a
big gap in the tasks somewhere else. And as I've grabbed all the tasks for
myself ;) if you see something that I'm working on that you'd like a go at, let
me know. Another thing that would be useful is to see how generalizable the
basic setup is to other models. I'd like to have it work -- probably requiring
a bit of glue customization -- for arbitrary GMF and perhaps even pure GEF /
Graphiti models, so that might worth looking at.
We still haven't really decided what to do about two things: 1. EMF tree editor
(e.g. the Sample Model editor, etc..) as well as general EMF.Edit generated
editors. That might require a specialized editor though it might be possible to
do something with the adapter factory, I'll have to look into that. 2. Layouts.
There are a lot of issues with how or if it makes sense to approach actually
laying out the editors depending on DOI.
>
>> BTW, Benjamin just discovered yet another go at this from a year or so ago
>> [...]
> From first look it seems to be the same code as the one from Yongming, isn't
> it?
I thought so, but this one looked a little different to me -- could be wrong
about that as it's been a while since I looked at the other piece. I don't
think there is anything there that we haven't replicated. I've updated the wiki
for the GMF page to try to direct people to this effort.
cheers,
Miles
_______________________________________________
mylyn-integrators mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mylyn-integrators
