OK, thanks! >If you're not bothered though, let me know and I'll just push it.
It's just a one-liner, so yeah, you can just push it. On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Andrew Chadwick <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi -- > > Sorry to keep you waiting. > > I'm OK with accepting this change. It's been discussed before in the bug > tracker: > https://gna.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=20817 > details the versions of libjson[-c] where this becomes needed. > > For Debian systems, the 0.11 packages use a compatibility symlink with the > old name, which is why I was hanging fire on this. However, there's support > in both the most recent LTS Ubuntu > http://packages.ubuntu.com/libjson0-dev > and even Debian stable (via backports) > https://packages.debian.org/libjson0-dev > so there's no reason to stick with the 0.10 name any more in order to > support these OSes to the extent we want. > If people want support for very old versions of libjson-c, they can maintain > their own patch :) > > Ideally, would you be able to re-express this using git format-patch? A pull > request on github or gitorious would be fine too. That way you get to write > the commit message, and gain credit (even for a oneliner; let's be > scrupulous). If you're not bothered though, let me know and I'll just push > it. > > On Thursday, 19 June 2014, akbjker <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello? Guys? > > > > -- > Andrew Chadwick _______________________________________________ Mypaint-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/mypaint-discuss
