Jeremy D. Zawodny wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 11:53:40PM -0800, Mike Wexler wrote:
>
>
>> Actually, I'm pretty sure it would need to be done in the MySQL
>
>> server. It could be done with either the master or the slave, but I
>
>> think the slave would be cleaner.
>
>
>
> Probably true. I just haven't thought too hard about it. I might be
>
> possible today for the *first* slave, but after that it seems like it
>
> can't be done.
I don't see why not. I'm assuming the master would transmit all updates
and the slave would ignore the ones for tables that were not yet being
monitored. I don't see why it matters whether its the first or last slave.
>>> Good point. I'll sleep tomorrow. :-)
>
>>
>> You must not have kids :-)
>
>
>
> True statement. Plus I have flexible work hours. It's a double-edged
> sword, really...
Having both kids and flexible work hours means you never sleep :-) Its
like a double edged sword with a mind of its own.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive)
To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
