Hi folks, The recent additions of storage handler for transaction-supporting table confuses us. From what I read on the list, Innobase is generally much faster than BerkeleyDB. But I can live with slower speed since my application will not be expecting high rates. It is reliability and tested product which I am more concerned with. Could somebody provide a general overview and comparison of BerkeleyDB, Innobase, and the upcoming Gemini? Regarding speed, space efficiency, recovery, and memory footprint. Better still if it ends with the practical advice on choosing between them (i.e.: you should choose Innobase if ..., but use BerkeleyDB if ...). I believe that is also a manual/FAQ material. Thanks in advance! Steve --------------------------------------------------------------------- Before posting, please check: http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual) http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive) To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
