Newbie on the list here having a bit of confusion at the moment why an INNER JOIN is taking so long... I have replaced a few column names to make it a bit more succinct:


SELECT COUNT(*) FROM data, values, names

WHERE data.campaign_id = 22
AND names.name = 'content'
AND values.value = 'index'

AND data.name_id = names.id
AND data.value_id = value.id;


This query should pull out all of the index content from the data table for campaign 22. name_id and value_id are indexed, as are the name and value fields of the names and values tables. campaign_id is also indexed in the data table and each name and value is unique per campaign. The vardata dataset for this campaign that has around 163000 entries and the above query takes nearly a minute to run. Total size of data table is around 3 million records.


On the same machine, the following query takes roughly 2 seconds to run:


CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE IF NOT EXISTS names_temp SELECT names.id as var_id, values.id as val_id FROM values, names

WHERE names.campaign_id = 22
AND values.campaign_id = names.campaign_id

AND names.name = 'content'
AND values.value = 'index';

SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM vardata, names_temp
WHERE vardata.varNameId = names_temp.var_id
AND vardata.varValueId = names_temp.val_id;


After looking at EXPLAIN for both, I understand that the latter is faster because it is doing lookups based on constant values, but I have a gut feeling that this kind of join should be able to be done with similar speed without having to use a temp table... Is there any way to optimize the performance of the join query without having to go with the two-query option?




--
Thanks,
Mathew

..................................
Mathew J. Ray
Sr. Interactive Developer
IQ Television Group
..................................



--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:    http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to