Hi, I have a big query that involves searching in more tables, and I think this might be slower than creating more smaller queries. What do you think, is this true generally?
The query searches in a big table but it also counts the number of records from other 2 tables based on a criteria, and usually the result is a big number of records, but the final result is limited using "limit 0,30". So I am wondering... Could it work faster if I won't count(*) the number of records in those 2 tables, but get the result (only 30 records), then for each separate record use a separate query that gets that number? I don't know, could 31 queries work faster than a single bigger and complex query? Thank you. Teddy -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
