Hello.
> And I guess you also refer to the strange behavior that it's different when > adding an ORDER BY or GROUP BY, right? Yes, in my opinion, ORDER BY shouldn't change the column's type. "M DR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for your answers, > > What is according to you the bug? Should it always return a string format > value? Or should it always return a system.byte[] format value? > > And I guess you also refer to the strange behavior that it's different when > adding an ORDER BY or GROUP BY, right? > > Kind regards, > > Martin > -- For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita This email is sponsored by Ensita.NET http://www.ensita.net/ __ ___ ___ ____ __ / |/ /_ __/ __/ __ \/ / Gleb Paharenko / /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__ [EMAIL PROTECTED] /_/ /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/ MySQL AB / Ensita.NET <___/ www.mysql.com -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
