--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > <<<<Everything snipped>>>> > > David, is it at all intuitive to organize your > geography into a tree-type > structure? Here is an example: > > Western Hemisphere (hemisphere) > C. America (continent) > Guatemala (country) > N. America (continent) > Canada (country) > Manitoba (state/province) > Moose > Elk
I see what you're saying, but I'm not sure if it's workable. I'd need a separate row for every state, province and nation the moose is native to. Ditto for each of hundreds of species of rodents and bats. Instead, I'm linking species to ecoregions, then linking the ecoregions to geographic regions - which may just be another version of what you're suggesting. In fact, I have all the animal species organized into a tree structure, and I already have a separate tree structure for nations, states, etc. Maybe I can combine them somehow. Thanks. __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]