thanks.
I have read the links with you said.
But i have a question,too.

What would happen if i call a non-deterministic function that have been 
declared deterministic.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gleb Paharenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <mysql@lists.mysql.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 6:19 PM
Subject: Re: use deterministic within procedure


> Hello.
> 
> This not a complete answer for your questions, but you can find a lot of
> useful information from it (I hope). This procedure should produce
> different results on master and slave if master has server_id=1 and
> slave has server_id=2:
> 
> mysql> delimiter //
> mysql> CREATE PROCEDURE unsafe_sp ()
>     -> BEGIN
>     ->   IF @@server_id=2 THEN DROP DATABASE accounting; END IF;
>     -> END;
>     -> //
> mysql> delimiter ;
> mysql> CALL unsafe_sp();
> 
> I've taken this procedure from:
>   http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/stored-procedure-logging.html
> 
> Example of non-deterministic data modifications you can find here as well:
>   http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/open-bugs.html
> 
> You can check by your self if it is possible to replicate functions
> which was declared NOT DETERMINISTIC.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >I have read the replicate document in reference manual.But i have some
> >question.
> 
> >1.If a deterministic storeprocedure only use in replication?
> >2.If a procedure within replication must be deterministic?
> >3.When a procedure result is non-deterministic?Can i get a example?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> wangxu wrote:
> 
> 
> -- 
> For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita
> This email is sponsored by Ensita.NET http://www.ensita.net/
>    __  ___     ___ ____  __
>   /  |/  /_ __/ __/ __ \/ /    Gleb Paharenko
>  / /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> /_/  /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/   MySQL AB / Ensita.NET
>        <___/   www.mysql.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> MySQL General Mailing List
> For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
> To unsubscribe:    http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

Reply via email to