That is exactly the issue.

Also if you use the real address to determine the lat/lon instead of the zip
code, the result will be different.


-----Original Message-----
From: Logan, David (SST - Adelaide) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 6:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Daevid Vincent
Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: RE: Calculate LONG/LAT from ZIP+4 (positve vs. negative longitude)


You could further explain the lats and longs being "slightly off" by the use
of a different datum. There are many many datums utilised by different
geographical/geological authorities. This difference could become quite
large dependent upon the datum used. 
 
As gmail user as noted, negative = West and South, positive = North and
East.
 
Regards
---------------------------------------------------------------
********** _/     **********  David Logan 
*******   _/         *******  ITO Delivery Specialist - Database
*****    _/            *****  Hewlett-Packard Australia Ltd
****    _/_/_/  _/_/_/  ****  E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
****   _/  _/  _/  _/   ****  Desk:   +618 8408 4273
****  _/  _/  _/_/_/    ****  Mobile: 0417 268 665
*****        _/       ******    
******      _/      ********  Postal: 148 Frome Street,
********   _/     **********          Adelaide SA 5001
                                      Australia 
i    n    v    e    n    t                                   
---------------------------------------------------------------
 

________________________________

From: Peter Brawley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, 26 April 2006 11:17 AM
To: Daevid Vincent
Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: Calculate LONG/LAT from ZIP+4 (positve vs. negative
longitude)


Daevid Vincent wrote: 

        My confusion is that I have some formulas to plug in these values,
but it
        seems to me that if I use the wrong set of data, my zipcodes will be
wrong
        too. I also don't understand why there is even such a difference. I
can
        understand a few decimal points being different, but I don't
understand how
        they are positive and negative, when it's supposed to be based upon
the
        equator and the prime meridian. 

Hasn't that already been explained here? Sign is entirely a matter of
convenience and convention.

PB




          

                -----Original Message-----
                From: Gmail User [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
                Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 6:03 AM
                To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
                Subject: RE: Calculate LONG/LAT from ZIP+4 (positve vs. 
                negative longitude)
                
                On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 00:43 -0700, Daevid Vincent wrote:
                    

                        So for a sanity check, I decided to look
"online" and punch 
                              

                in some to see
                    

                        what the "real" lat/long should be. Well,
different sites 
                              

                give different
                    

                        values, and not only are they "slightly" off,
but sometimes they're
                        _positive_ or _negative_!? UGH!
                              

                Not sure what your confusion is. It is a matter of
notation. The
                negative value represents West where it is negative (as
would be the
                East; note how there is no W mentioned there). 
                    

        
        
          



--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:    http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  • ... Nicolas Verhaeghe
    • ... Adam i Agnieszka GÄ…siorowski FNORD aka ALinkA ak a symbol '( { .A. } )'' ||~> { A.A }
      • ... Gary M. Allen

Reply via email to