I was getting a little OT there Gaspar. It might be better for me to file a feature request on mysl bug reporting page for any un-necessary functionality and the associated documentation to be removed from mysql in version 6.0.x, rather than hijacking this thread!
Regards Keith On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Gaspar Bakos wrote: > To: Keith Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: Gaspar Bakos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: my-huge.cnf quite outdated > > Hi, Keith, > > RE: > > This seems to be the way things are with mysql nowdays. > > Is it not time for the developers to take a serious look > > into culling all the outdated and multiple ways of > > accomplishing the same thing from mysql and the > > documentation? > > This is a somewhat different subject. > But you are right about it. > > On the other hand, I have been using MySQL since 2001, and I enjoy > looking at the old syntax, and seeing how it changed helps me > understanding what the new syntax means. > > Back to my-huge.cnf, I am sure there are many people reading the list > who run MySQL on big-big servers, and they must have figured out how to > optimize it. I am curious about their advice. > > > > Any opinions of the following : ? > > > > > > [mysqld] > > > key_buffer_size=1024M > > > myisam_sort_buffer_size=256M > > > sort_buffer_size=256M > > > bulk_insert_buffer_size=64M > > > join_buffer_size=64M > > > max_connections=5 > > > read_buffer_size=8M > > > read_rnd_buffer_size=8M > > > net_buffer_length=1M > > > max_allowed_packet=16M > > Cheers, > Gaspar -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
