On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 13:02 +0700, Ady Wicaksono wrote: > On 10/9/06, Ow Mun Heng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 11:42 +0700, Ady Wicaksono wrote: > > > Is your MSSQL data structure contain such foreign key? > > > > > > If yes, my isam is not suitable for you > > > > Actually, you know what? I don't really know. > > How does one go about checking? > > Dump it to SQL, and make sure you know how foreign key SQL syntax > See: > http://www.windowsitlibrary.com/Content/77/12/1.html
Thanks. I'll take look. > > > Others... for overall, i prefer innodb :) > > > > I know it's transaction safe and all, but not too sure if I need the > > extra overhead. > > If your concern is fast insert, how fast do you need? is 3000 rows > insert/seconds enough? I think That's _way_ enough. Looking through the select (group by date/time etc) I see the max is ~2000 or so inserts (per Minute :-)) > if your concern is fast read, tune your innodb buffer, bigger memory > bigger performance :) My concern is fast reads. Based on http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/09/29/what-to-tune-in-mysql-server-after-installation/ the innodb_buffer_pool_size should be ~70-80% of main memory. -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
