Hi,
According to the manuel, Falcon is not yet optimized for performances,
so benchmarking it would not be fair.
And I do not recommand using the binary alpha release in production, you
could corrupt badly your database (some bugs has only been fixed a few
days ago concerning this corruption).
Regards,
Jocelyn Fournier
www.mesdiscussions.net
mos a écrit :
At 03:54 PM 1/25/2007, you wrote:
> Another thing to consider is:
heh, silly mail client :). Another thing to consider is this:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/falcon/en/index.html
Though it's "Not recommended for production use", I've heard people
still use
it in production environments.
--
Chris,
Falcon doesn't currently support RI. And like Innodb, it requires
its own table space so it too may get fragmented.
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/falcon/en/se-falcon-createdb.html and will
likely require packing (sweeping?) from time to time. It would be nice
to see some benchmarks compared to InnoDb and MyISAM.
Mike
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
