On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 06:39:21PM -0500, Kenneth Loafman wrote: > Interesting... guess the intent was a disconnect that would break code > trying to work on MySQL, regardless of engine selected. That decision > makes it two products, MySQL/MyISAM and MySQL/InnoDB with different > semantics. Yes, you can work around it, but its not transparent.
I think the purist's response to that would be that it is a bug in MySQL that MySQL does not support transactions always. But anyone for whom that is a problem probably isn't on this list ;-) -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
