You seemed to have answered your own question. What did you mean to ask?
On 10/28/07, B. Keith Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I dashed off this email too fast. What I meant to say was "I am > migrating our data partitions for MySQL from reiserfs to xfs because xfs > has faster write rates than reiserfs. > > > Craig Huffstetler wrote: > > I agree, Fedora is not very good at production work. Reiserfs is one > > of the best file systems I have come across for MySQL Production. > > > > On 10/28/07, *B. Keith Murphy * <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > In production we use both reiserfs and xfs. I am migrating our data > > partitions for mysql because it has faster write rates than > reiserfs. > > You need to stop using fedora and at least use CentOS. Fedora is > not > > stable for production work. > > > > Just my two cents :) > > > > Keith > > > > Ali Nebi wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > i want to ask for your opinions about the best combination for > mysql > > > with filesystem (like ext2, ext3... and so on). > > > > > > We have problems with mysql under fedora 6 with ext3 and i want to > > > know under wich filesystem mysql works best. > > > > > > I will be glad to read your opinions. > > > > > > Thanks in advanced. > > > Regards, Ali Nebi! > > > > > > > > > -- > > MySQL General Mailing List > > For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql > > To unsubscribe: > > http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > MySQL General Mailing List > For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql > To unsubscribe: > http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
