MAS! wrote: > does the "lock table" on MySQL (I'm using 5.0.22 or 5.0.45) works even > for a cached result? > > this is my scenario, (I'm using MyIsam tables) > > thread 1: > LOCK TABLE foo WRITE; > > thread 2: > SELECT * FROM foo ; > (locked) > > thread 1: > UNLOCK TABLES; > > thread 2: > result of SELECT * .. > > and that's is, IMHO, correct; btw, if the result of the select is in the > cache, it seems that I'm unable to 'lock' again the table: > > thread 1: > LOCK TABLE foo WRITE; > > thread 2: > SELECT * FROM foo ; > I have the result of the select; that was not 'locked' :( > > the only way I found to avoid that is use the SQL_NO_CACHE (then SELECT > SQL_NO_CACHE FROM foo) > > is that correct?! there is a way to avoid to specify "SQL_NO_CACHE" ? > or there is something wrong ?!
Try setting query_cache_wlock_invalidate to ON. Werner -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
