Thanks, Aaron. >> Will you be using the MyISAM or InnoDB table engines?
Both, but InnoDB more. >> I had heard that InnoDB uses 16k blocks internally, so that might be a good starting point, though I'd love to have someone confirm or deny that this is actually true. Ok, that's interesting. :-) I'll check it. Iñigo Aaron Blew wrote: > Will you be using the MyISAM or InnoDB table engines? > > I had heard that InnoDB uses 16k blocks internally, so that might be a good > starting point, though I'd love to have someone confirm or deny that this is > actually true. > > -Aaron > > > On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 12:01 AM, Iñigo Medina García < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi friends, >> >> we're developing a new web application that works with a db around 1gb >> and 30 tables. >> >> We work with linux, and I'm evaluating the benefit of making an specific >> partition (ext3) for mysql in order to have a bigger Block Size. Block >> Size by default in / partition is 4096. >> >> Do you think that could be good? Any experience? >> >> Iñigo >> >> -- >> -------- >> Iñigo Medina García >> Librería Díaz de Santos >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> -- >> MySQL General Mailing List >> For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql >> To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > -- -------- Iñigo Medina García Librería Díaz de Santos Madrid (Spain) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
