Thanks. Yes it's a delicate construct but tables like 'IP2Location' give me a headache as NDB tables. Yet I have to test if 7.0.X can handle it.
-----Original Message----- From: Michael Dykman [mailto:mdyk...@gmail.com] Sent: Mittwoch, 14. Oktober 2009 17:33 To: Christian Meisinger Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com Subject: Re: MySQL Cluster / NDB & MyISAM mix I can think of no reason why this shouldn't work, My administrator colleagues would probably beat me with 2x4's for handing them such a delicate construct to maintain in production but it seems perfectly feasible to me :-) - michael dykman On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Christian Meisinger <c.meisin...@livingliquid.com> wrote: > Hi guys. > > Ok lets say i've 2 server running MySQL, NDB node and NDB manager on each. > Now I don't want to convert all tables to NDB instead I leave a few as > MyISAM. > Is it officially supported if I setup a master-master replication between > the two MySQL instances and add ignore entries for all NDB tables? > > So basically I would convert all important tables to NDB and leave other > tables as MyISAM, but they would still be 'synced' via replication. > > I've tested it and it look like it works... but... does it work by > coincidence? :) > > > Thanks, chris > > > -- > MySQL General Mailing List > For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql > To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=mdyk...@gmail.com > > -- - michael dykman - mdyk...@gmail.com Dont worry about people stealing your ideas. If theyre any good, youll have to ram them down their throats! Howard Aiken -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=arch...@jab.org
