On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 06:55:34PM +0200, Thomas Seifert wrote:
>
> just another question. I have a lot of tables in one mysql-database
> (around 3200 for now) because I am running Phorum with a lot of
> boards. (yes I am working on it to split it in different databases
> but it can take a while).
>
> So my question is ... does that mass of tables in one database have
> some impact on the performance of mysql? Could it be, that it
> creates higher load on the server it is running?
I'd expect that it depends on your filesystem. Some filesystems are
better than others at handling directories with a large amount of
files in them. But 3,200 isn't *THAT* large anyway...
On Linux, ReiserFS is known to be faster than ext2 in such cases.
Jeremy
--
Jeremy D. Zawodny, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Technical Yahoo - Yahoo Finance
Desk: (408) 349-7878 Fax: (408) 349-5454 Cell: (408) 439-9951
MySQL 3.23.29: up 17 days, processed 112,767,258 queries (75/sec. avg)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive)
To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
