Hello Ian Simpson,

Thank you for reply. We defined table names, fields in lower cases except the 
KEYS . I hope the Key will not taken into the account[all in upper case].

Regarding the version we will keep same version as you said. 

Thank you

--- On Thu, 18/3/10, Ian Simpson <i...@it.myjobgroup.co.uk> wrote:

From: Ian Simpson <i...@it.myjobgroup.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Replication - LINUX to WIN
To: "Vikram A" <vikkiatb...@yahoo.in>
Cc: "MY SQL Mailing list" <mysql@lists.mysql.com>
Date: Thursday, 18 March, 2010, 9:33 AM

Hi Vikram,

There are a couple of potential problems with Linux to Windows
replication, but they are easily avoidable.

1) Table names: There are case-sensitivity differences between Linux and
Windows: Linux is case-sensitive as regards table names, whereas Windows
is not. Given that you are replicating from a Linux master to a Windows
slave, you shouldn't hit too many problems with this, but if you ever
reverse the order for some reason there could be problems.

2) MySQL versions: try to make sure that you always use the same version
of MySQL on client and slave (this is generally good replication advice
in all cases). There have been some bugs in replication that cause
problems when the master and slave are on different versions.

On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 14:03 +0530, Vikram A wrote:
> Hi,
> I have done replication with Win to Win servers with mysql version 
> 5.0.41-community-nt. 
> 
> Now, 
> We have Enterprise Linux(Red Hat 4.1.2-14) and windows server2003.
> Is it possible do the replication LINUX(Master) to WINDOWS SERVER2003(Slave) ?
> 
> It will be great help to me.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> VIKRAM A
> 
> 
> 
>       The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage. 
>http://in.yahoo.com/


-- 
Ian Simpson
System Administrator
MyJobGroup




      The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage. 
http://in.yahoo.com/

Reply via email to