On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 11:53:04AM +0200, Warren van der Merwe wrote:
>
> I have a triangluar replication system working 100%, A -- > B, B -- > C,
> C -- > A.
>
> What I know want to know is, is replication intelligent enough that
> if A had to sometimes connect to C, and replicate, and then the next
> day connect to B again, and so on and so on, would everything still
> work, or would disaster strike?
>
> Sometimes I may want to get urgent info through to C, so instead of
> dialling into B, and then B dialling into C, I want to Dial C
> directly from A, but when the daily connection takes place, A will
> be connecting to B again, etc etc ect
Hmm...
Are you planning to run a "CHANGE MASTER..." command on the slave (A)
each time? If so, it ought to work if you're careful with making sure
that the binary log position number is correct.
I assume that the binary logs will be identical in size on all hosts,
but haven't personally verified that. It should be pretty easy to
test, however.
Jeremy
--
Jeremy D. Zawodny, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Technical Yahoo - Yahoo Finance
Desk: (408) 349-7878 Fax: (408) 349-5454 Cell: (408) 685-5936
MySQL 3.23.41-max: up 3 days, processed 33,496,896 queries (109/sec. avg)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive)
To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
