In the last episode (Dec 13), Tim Wood said: > As mentioned above, I'm a lazy unit, so if possible would like to > avoid restructuring the DB to spread the document body table across > >1 table (thus enabling > 4 G of doc bodies), so am looking for some > easier way to do it (eg upgrading mysql, or using a different fs type > etc). > > Does anyone out there know of any > - future plans by the mysql development crew to increase table size > limits by eg using their own custom filesystem type?
You mean the MyISAM RAID table extension, or the Innodb tablespace format? Done. Check the manual for details. > - any kernel fs patches I might apply to get around the 4G limit imposed > by the linux kernel > - any alternative filesystems (JFS?) that might permit greater table > sizes under mysql 2.4.2 should support 64-bit files just fine. -- Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- Before posting, please check: http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual) http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive) To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php