Title: ³×À̹ö ¸ÞÀÏ
|
|
¹ÚÂù¹Î (naracom2002) ´Ô²² º¸³»½Å ¸ÞÀÏ <Re: Bug in replication 3.23.46-max>
ÀÌ ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº ÀÌÀ¯·Î Àü¼Û ½ÇÆÐÇß½À´Ï´Ù.
|
-------------------------------------------- |
|
¼ö½ÅÀÚÀÇ ¸ÞÀÏ º¸°ü ¿ë·®ÀÌ °¡µæÂ÷ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ³ªÁß¿¡ ´Ù½Ã ½ÃµµÇϽʽÿÀ.
|
|
-------------------------------------------- |
|
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 10:34:03PM -0500, Wendell Dingus wrote:
>
> I've tried this a bunch of times and different ways and can confirm
> that in the 3-server setup I described an alter table does NOT
> propogate. Can't see it in the binary log at all. No reference to
> the table name, nothing.. Create table and drop table show up and
> propogate just fine... Just adding a field to a table or similar do
> not.
Hmm... That's odd.
Are you replicating *everything*, or is the master (or a slave) set to
filter any of the queries based on db or table?
Jeremy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremy Zawodny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:23 PM
> To: Wendell Dingus
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Bug in replication 3.23.46-max
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:59:07PM -0500, Wendell Dingus wrote:
> >
> > I'm fairly certain this is a bug. It's on 3.23.46-max and the
> > changelog for .47 doesn't mention it.
> >
> > I have 2 servers using replication. Server1 is used by client
> > machines and all updates are to it. Server2 stays in perfect sync
> > with it and logs all updates to it's own binary log. I then use
> > mysqlbinlog from server2 to parse out those database changes every
> > half hour or so and send to another server via a (part-time)
> > internet connection where it attempts to maintain a synced copy of
> > the data as well. A "modify table" to add a new field on server1
> > propogates to server2 but NOT to the third server. I've not tracked
> > down exactly where things are breaking down yet. Server1 and 2 are
> > Linux and are using INNODB tables. Server3 is not Linux and is not
> > able to use INNODB at the moment. Even a "create table
> > ... type=INNODB" works on server3 making the table MyISAM
> > instead. It's just the modify table statements with the addition of
> > a new field that don't make it.
> >
> > I've not captured and analyzed one of the binary logs yet but will
> > try to do so. Just wanted to let someone know of a probable
> > bug. I'll also upgrade to .47 and report back if that resolves this.
>
> But you can see the query in the binary log? Is it just a case of
> mysqlbinlog not extracting the query properly?
>
> Jeremy
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Before posting, please check:
> http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
> http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive)
>
> To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
>
--
Jeremy D. Zawodny, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Technical Yahoo - Yahoo Finance
Desk: (408) 349-7878 Fax: (408) 349-5454 Cell: (408) 685-5936
MySQL 3.23.41-max: up 19 days, processed 440,690,650 queries (264/sec. avg)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive)
To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
--- End Message ---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive)
To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php