We're currently using MyISAM tables for everything. Are there circumstances in which the InnoDB table type would be better even if we're not going to use commit/rollback, or are transactions the only advantage of InnoDB? Would InnoDB's row-level locking improve speed over MyISAM for tables that have lots of updates and inserts, or does the transaction overhead cancel that out?
-- Keith C. Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Washington, DC --------------------------------------------------------------------- Before posting, please check: http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual) http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive) To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
