Hi Jay! Mon, 20 May 2002 07:45:00 -0500, tu as dit :
> [snip] > I have just tried this, but it still takes 1.5sec to run the > select... :-( > [/snip] > Fabien, > How many records do you have in each table? And just how fast do you want > this query to be? 1.5 seconds may be optimal for a query this large. Perhaps > the only thing you could do at this point is beef up your server. Not that large, I got about 8.000 records in each table. I did put the body out from the news table, so the news table could be small, and news_body which I don't request all the time would be the bigger one. If I do 2 selects, one to fetch info from the news table, and then another one to fetch bodies, it takes much less time, like 0.05 for each request. Did I miss something ? I could still use thoses 2 requests, but I'd prefer to merge them into one, so I don't have to use temporarly variables. -- Fabien Penso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LinuxFr a toujours besoin de : http://perso.LinuxFr.org/penso/ | http://linuxFr.org/dons/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Before posting, please check: http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual) http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive) To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
