If you're using InnoDB tables, replication stops the slaves from running. Heikki said he'd try to get this fixed for 3.23.52.
--Pete On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 04:05:11PM +0200, Lutz Maibach wrote: > Hi, > > today I noticed a strange behaviour in MySQL 3.23.49a-Replication I can't explain. > A perl-script which controls whether master- and replication-tables are equal showed > me, that a master-table was missing on both slaves (two backups are better than one > :-) ) > > When I controlled the master update-log I saw that the master-table was renamed with > the following command: > ALTER TABLE ad_429_t RENAME adprj_7; > > This command was missing in the slave-updatelogs. The sql-statements before and > right after the missing one were present and no error was written down in the > mysql-error-log. > > Trying to find out whether the Rename-Statement works right or not I did some tests > with renaming a table but all actions were performed on the slaves too. > > Has someone experienced the same? I'm now a bit unsure whether the replication is > working right. > > Greetings from Germany > > Lutz Maibach > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Before posting, please check: > http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual) > http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive) > > To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php --------------------------------------------------------------------- Before posting, please check: http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual) http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive) To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
