Reinier,
Thursday, August 15, 2002, 1:13:32 PM, you wrote:

RvH> I have a mysql database latest version from the freebsd ports running on a
RvH> 350 Mhz with 385 MB memory and 1 ata 33 disk freebsd 4.6 stable server.

RvH> I have a database with 5.5 million record in say 1 table. We use this
RvH> read-only.

RvH> It seems that when i do a select and the result is minimal it uses the
RvH> index(fast about 3 sec), but when the result is much more it is not using
RvH> the index. this results in a lot of disk io and taking to much time.

RvH> My experience with msql7 is that it keeps thing in memory with results in
RvH> performance improvement. Can this be done with mysql? When i use top i don't
RvH> see mysql using much of my memory.

RvH> I haven't changed any settings yet in my.cnf.

What about using query cache? If you don't modify the data and run a
lot of identical queries, it would be useful for you. Query cache is
supported since 4.0.1 :
          http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Query_Cache.html





-- 
For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita
This email is sponsored by Ensita.net http://www.ensita.net/
   __  ___     ___ ____  __
  /  |/  /_ __/ __/ __ \/ /    Egor Egorov
 / /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/_/  /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/   MySQL AB / Ensita.net
       <___/   www.mysql.com



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/           (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php

Reply via email to