sql, query ... just to make the filter happy. on 11/8/02 2:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You are missing something, I am afraid. To quite Sun's Javadoc for the > PooledConnection class Thank you so much for the quick reply. Now I understand why the implementation of pooled connections seemed so lame (why on earth did JDBC client code need to get a different kind of connection?). Strikes me that it's just as ridiculous that I have to implement the pooling scheme. It would have made more sense to provide a reasonable pooling scheme and allowed me to add my own, if I so desired. In any event, thank you. Now I know how to fix the problem! > The Java list - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - would probaby be more appropriate > than the general list, but otherwise this is the right place. Perhaps that should be mentioned on the Connector/J pages...I had no idea such a list existed. Thanks! -- Rick --------------------------------------------------------------------- Before posting, please check: http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual) http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive) To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
