i read in several places (like in recent osnews.com newspiece and some
other prior postings to this list) that mysql 4.0.x is supposed to be
"stable" now. but the front page of mysql.com still lists 4.0.5 under
"development".
so does the mysql developers suggest that mysql is still "unstable" or
"non-production" yet? i'd love to use some 4.x features, but i am
reluctant of migrating my max-3.23.53a installations over to max-4.0.5
because of this. is migration recommended/acceptable now? (yes, i know
the "if it ain't broken, don't fix it" saying. but i could use some of
the new features of 4.x...)
--
dave
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive)
To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
- Re: can 4.0.x be used to replace 3.23.xx _now_? David Garamond
- Re: can 4.0.x be used to replace 3.23.xx _now_? Jeremy Zawodny