Hi Maciej, 1) MySQL works very fine for me I have 3 servers with about 150 connections per server. For other success stories see http://www.mysql.com/press/user_stories/index.html
2) for configuration info see the example configuation files included with mysql my-huge.cnf and my-large.cnf and the on-line manual for where to place them. 3) There are many improvements in 4.0 and 4.1, but handling connections still works great. Please use 4.0 as it is the current production version, 4.1 is still alpha. 4) Sorry can't help with #4 maybe others can offer advice. We run our own servers. Best of luck. Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: "Maciej Zagozda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 12:20 PM Subject: Simultaneus TCP/IP connections > I have the following problem: many ISPs reject to offer mySQL hosting > and handling remote connections via TCP/IP, they are saying that the > mySQL may become unstable with about 50 simultaneus TCP/IP connections. > Finally I'm thinking about setting up an own mySQL server on W2K (pro) > for the project I'm planning, but still I would like to ask you: > > 1. Is it true that mySQL can not handle up to 50 simultaneus remote > connections? > 2. How to eventually configure mySQL to handle such number of > connections on Win2K (pro)? > 3. Is there any significant improvement in handling remote connections > in version 4.xxx? > 4. Can you advice some reliable provider that eventually offer quite > cheap hosting? > > Regards, Maciej > > > -- > MySQL General Mailing List > For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql > To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
