6/27/03 6:37:49 PM, Jeremy Zawodny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> My read/update ratio would be something along the lines of 1:3, 3 >> updates for every read. So it is highly unusual, and more or less >> rules replication out of the picture. > >I'm unclear why you can't use replication for this. There must be an >assumption about what you're doing that we do not share. > >If you read from the slave and write to the master, why does this not >work?
A slave would simply not be able to keep up, replication works really well if you have a lot of reads, and a small number of updates. This is reverse ways, and needs a different approach. -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
