On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 10:57:52AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jul 07), Nils Valentin said: > > Thank you for the superfast reply. I actually was looking for other > > information. I understood the actual feature difference of the > > standard and f.e max version. Sorry if this didnt came out so clear. > > I will try to make it clearer. > > > > My question was more aiming at what advantages the dynamically > > linking or the statically linking have (except the memory usage of > > course). I was thinking when given 2 times the same versions once > > linked statically and once linked dynamically which one would have > > which advantages in regards to performance, reliability etc. ? > > You can't call dlopen() on a statically-linked binary, so you can't use > UDFs. On the other hand, static binaries usually run ~20% faster.
20%?! That seems like a high number. Have you actually seed that much of a boost? Jeremy -- Jeremy D. Zawodny | Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://jeremy.zawodny.com/ MySQL 4.0.13: up 7 days, processed 217,761,232 queries (348/sec. avg) -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
