> It looks like Igor comitted it to the 4.1 tree on the 2nd of this
month:

I'd assume that this change is necessary but not sufficient for the
MySQL table type table locking issue...

I know, I know, there is InnoDB for that, but there are reasons not to
use it despite this particular wonderful advantage.

--steve-


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:    http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to