Hello,
We run a master-slave configuration and are considering migrating a few tables to InnoDB to get transaction capability...
Question is, can we keep the tables as MyISAM on the slaves to maintain the high-speed accesses? I suppose this would require the SQL not being written to the bin-log until it's committed, and we would need to convert the tables on the master without the slaves knowing about it...
Anybody doing anything like this? Or am I simply barking up the wrong tree?
Yes, this is a common strategy, actually.
Transactions are not written to the binary log on the master until they are committed, so that's already taken care of. (Rolled back transactions never appear in the binary log.)
-Matt-
-- Paul DuBois, Senior Technical Writer Madison, Wisconsin, USA MySQL AB, www.mysql.com
Are you MySQL certified? http://www.mysql.com/certification/
-- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
