Chua Choon Keng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am new to mysql replication. I know how to use
> the --replicate* options but I would like to know
> whether the options act as filter on the master or
> on the slave...
On the slave.
>
> From the documentation, it says:
> "The --replicate-* rules are evaluated as follows
> to determine whether a statement will be executed
> by the slave or ignored"
>
> This gives me the impression that all update
> queries are sent to slave, but if they are not
> matched by the rules, they are ignored. In my case,
> I am replicating a database with infrequent
> updates, but they are many other databases on the
> master with frequent updates etc. If my guess is
> correct, then I am wasting a lot of bandwidth as my
> master & slave are world apart...
>
What about using binlog-do-db=database_name option? In this case only updates will be
logged if the current database is database_name:
http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Binary_log.html
--
For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita
This email is sponsored by Ensita.net http://www.ensita.net/
__ ___ ___ ____ __
/ |/ /_ __/ __/ __ \/ / Egor Egorov
/ /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/_/ /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/ MySQL AB / Ensita.net
<___/ www.mysql.com
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
