Hi,
thank you very much for your reply.

Now I answer you about your additional questions:

Now the daemon is installed on a machine different than DB Server, so I
use DBServer NIC IP Address for connect to it from the daemon (So I don't
use Unix Sockets).

But, looking at the Network Bandwidth, there isn't bottleneck (but I have
read that Unix Socket are more quickly).

My SCSI HD are not in RAID. Actually are fully indipendent and works on a
RAID controller 160Mb/s (the same speed of the disks).

Probably in the future I'll use RAID tech that improves performance
(RAID-5, RAID-0+1), but not in this beginning step.

J2SE project source compiled becomes a bytecode (not exe and not source);
this is runnable only on a Java Virtual Machine.... (It is like
half-compiled).

Before decide to develope in J2SE I have made some tests about performance
differences between JDBC and MySQL client API....

MySQL client API obviously are more quickly, but no so much. Also I have
read documentations about the MySQL JDBC Connector that are the best Java
Native DB Connector (also better than other famous DBMS JDBC).

Here is MYISAM table structure.....

create table pippo
(
        type            varchar(10)             not null,
        time_1          varchar(8)              not null,
        value           decimal(8,2)            not null,
        state           char(2)                 not null,
        primary key     (type, time_1)
)
type = MyIsam;

How you can see the table structure is very simple....

The MotherBoard is a GigaByte GA-7VA.

here is the link about it:

http://tw.giga-byte.com/MotherBoard/Products/Products_GA-7VA.htm

Red Hat 9.B info:

the kernel version is 2.4.20-20.9 i686.

on the os are installed and run only

2 MySQL server,sshd,syslog,cron,atd,anacron.

When I boot the machine, I have only 40Mb Ram used.

All It seems ok.

I don't have anymore to say...

If you need other info, I am here....
Thank you very much again.

Best Regards
Alfredo Marchini
Developer Manager
SysNet Solutions S.r.l.
Via Rimini, 49 - Centro Dir. Leonardo da Vinci
59100 Prato (PO) - Italy
Tel. +390574/484822 - Fax +390574/448075

>
> Alfredo,
>
> I have just a few additional questions that you did not already answer
in
> your very well-formed post. I normally wouldn't worry about ANY of these
issues but you seem to be exploring the envelope of performance on your
system and every little bit counts:
>
> Which communication path are you using to connect to your MySQL servers
from your application (TCP/IP or sockets  or ...)? If TCP/IP are you
pointing to the IP address of your NIC or to 127.0.0.1?
>
> Are your HD's in a RAID configuration? If so which one?
>
> Could you post the results of SHOW CREATE TABLE so that we can see what
indexes, if any, you have on your data?
>
> Are there any other applications running on the same machine? I know you
said your CPU usage didn't pass 40% but am looking for disk I/O
congestion
> or data bus congestion or some other resource contention.
>
> Is your application compiled or interpreted? I am not familiar with J2SE
but I do know that some Java-based implementations give you the option
to
> compile applications into either a stand-alone executable or to object
code. Object code is interpreted by the Java runtime engine during
execution which may be slowing you down.
>
> (as a last resort) What is the speed of the data bus on your
motherboard?
>
> Thank you for your patience,
> Shawn Green
> Database Administrator
> Unimin Corporation - Spruce Pine
>
>
>
>
>
>                       "Alfredo Marchini"
>                       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]        To:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>                       lutions.it>                       cc:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>                                                         Fax to:
>                       06/25/2004 03:24 AM               Subject:  info
> about MySQL Server
>                       Please respond to
>                       alfredo.marchini
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear Sir,
>
> Sergei Golubchik gives me this e-mail address telling me that you can
help
> me about a project that my company is developing.
>
> we need to develope a J2SE project that works on N MYSQL 4.0.20 servers
installed on the same machine.
>
> Now I try to explain my problem.
>
> The Hardware, actually, is a normal PC:
>
> CPU AMD ATHLON XP 2000+
> RAM 770Mb DDR
> 2 * HD SCSI 160Mb/s.
>
> With a Red Hat Linux 9.B installed.
>
> Now (the beginning) I use only 2 MYSQL server, one for SCSI disk.
>
> The two MYSQL servers are totally indipendent.
>
> In either of these, I have created a database, and a MYISAM table. The
size of one record is 30 bytes and there is only an index made by two
fields (varchar(8) and varchar(10)).
>
> I need to insert in this table-structrure an amount of data that have to
be, at least, the size of 35.000 records for second, 24 hours for day,
31
> days for month.
>
> I reached, using only one MYSQL server, 20.000 records for second.
>
> Installing two services I hoped that I could reach 40.000 records for
second (or some minus) because MySQL servers should work in paraller
mode.
>
> But it isn't the truth, the speed doesn't increment.
>
> the J2SE project use multithreading technology, and is like a MySQL
servers load-balancer.
>
> Looking at the performance (with top), I see that the CPU never goes
over
> 40%, and the RAM is about 40%.
> These performance are similar using only one MySQL server or two MySQL
servers.
>
> I tried to correctly set MySQL system variables, I also tried to do an
higher priority to MySQL server processes, but the performance are the
same.
> Another strange thing is the thread_concurrencing running on MySQL
servers, looking at the status, threads running value never oltrepass 2,
and I set 8 thread_concurrency.
>
> Now I explain you how the final project should be:
>
> there is a J2SE software that runs as a daemon, it listen to a TCP port.
this daemon is connected (as a client with JConnector 3.0.14) to N MySQL
servers on a DBServer (at least 2 MYSQL services).
>
> the DBServer will be a very powerful server (because my customer needs
more than 35.000 records for second and many clients connected to the
daemon).
>
> A client connected to the daemon can do usually two things:
>
> asks the daemon to do insert data in database, or/and read data from
database.
> (So the daeamon uses only SELECT .. FROM ... WHERE ... LIMIT ... UNION
and
> INSERT INTO ... VALUES (),(),()).
>
> The client data requests are sent to the daemon that launchs queries on
the N MySQL Servers (as a balancer) and eventually gives the replies.
>
> The data have to be in real time (so I can't use INSERT DELAYED).
>
> the speed of the inserts have to be maximum as possible (at least 35.000
records for second).
>
> During the insert operations another clients, in the same moment, could
ask the daemon to give him the data inserted in a period.
>
> usually the data have about a size of 70Mb (1 day data), and the maximum
request is to give data of one entire month.
>
> More Clients can do these types of requests.
>
> Obviously I will create 4 tables for a day for either MySQL service. Now
I
> don't know if I'll use MySQL commands (MERGE, RAID or others) or I'll do
all from my daemon (I have to do test to take this decision).
>
> This is all....
>
> In your MySQL doc, I read that you have tested MySQL for a big Sweden
company, but you have not mentioned anything about the size of the data
that
> this company store, the clients connected, the size of the queries or
the
> number of inserts.
>
> First I would like to know if MySQL could reach these high
performance...
>
> Because my actually problem is the Hardware resource that aren't full
using my little PC.
> Why have I to buy a powerful server If this hardware isn't full used?
The
> bottleneck isn't in the SCSI disk (I installed MYSQL servers on RAMDISK
partitions with the same results).
> The bottleneck I think is MySQL, but I also think that it is well
configured.
>
> Here is my.cnf file (I have two equals configurations files, one for
MySQL
> server)
>
> port            = 330[0-1]
> socket          = /ptolle/ssc/db/mysql_[0-1].sock
> key_buffer = 256M
> max_allowed_packet = 1M
> table_cache = 512
> sort_buffer_size = 70M
> read_buffer_size = 70M
> query_cache_size = 70M
> thread_cache = 8
> thread_concurrency = 8 ---> no more than 2 threads run!!!
> max-connections = 200
> skip-innodb
>
> Finally I tried also to compile the MySQL tarball with the gcc (the
version is 3.2.2-5) compiler parameters that are mentioned in your
documentation without better results.
>
>
> have you got any parameters that limit MySQL performance (in the header
libraries or others)?
>
> or have you got some informations about MySQL configuration that could
speed up MySQL or bring MySQL services to work in paraller mode and use
all hardware resource avalaible?
>
> Thank you very much.
> Best Regards
>
>
> Alfredo Marchini
> Developer Manager
> SysNet Solutions S.r.l.
> Via Rimini, 49 - Centro Dir. Leonardo da Vinci
> 59100 Prato (PO)
> Tel. 0574/484822 - Fax 0574/448075
>
> --
> MySQL General Mailing List
> For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
> To unsubscribe:    http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:    http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to