Ben Suffolk wrote: > Hi, > > The first back trace attached to 1047 is mine, I re-opened it because > the appearance of the fault is identical, but I agree without a new > backtrace we have no idea if its the same fault as the original, it > may well be a different fault with exactly the same visible symptoms. > I'm sorry about that I'll run another backtrace for with svn head > tonight (just about to go to work now), and oen a new ticket with it. > > I think maybe with the other comments being added about seg faults > etc, this ticket may well have ended up covering 2 different faults, > one of which was fixed by 1075. > The other thing I was thinking was that when I did a debug rebuild to try and get a backtrace, I used only the 'debug' option, I did not specify '-enable-proc-opt' or any arch options, so perhaps there is some optimization during compile that is causing the problem? I did not get any segfaults running the debug build under gdb, but prior to that I could get one every time.
Tom _______________________________________________ mythtv-dev mailing list mythtv-dev@mythtv.org http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev