I think you hit the nail on the head. It's personal preference. VI vs.
EMACS, etc.
Regards,
JJ
On 15-Jan-2005, at 22:39, Scott Alfter wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 12:07:39PM -0500, John Johnson top-posted
(grr):
When comparing, don't be biased by AMD's (deceptive, IMO) "model
numbers". I.e. if you compare a 2.2GHz intel and a 2200+ AMD, you will
be disappointed with the performance, since the AMD 2200+ is a 1.5GHz
processor.
...and that is significant how, exactly? The microarchitecture of the
Athlon XP is significantly different from that of the Pentium 4, so
clockspeed comparisons are useless. Hell, you could say the same
thing when
comparing the Pentium 4 and Pentium M, which is probably why Intel is
moving
away from selling its processors on their clockspeed. Most people are
smart
enough to not do that, and they're finally catching on. (Then again,
most
people are also smart enough to not top-post. :-P )
_/_
/ v \ Scott Alfter (remove the obvious to send mail)
(IIGS( http://alfter.us/ Top-posting!
\_^_/ rm -rf /bin/laden >What's the most annoying thing on
Usenet?
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
