-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Robert Johnston wrote:
> On Apr 9, 2005 3:49 PM, John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> On Saturday 09 April 2005 8:52 am, Tony Godshall wrote: >> >>> Perhaps cfs? It's encrypted nfs, and security is a concern if >>> on wireless even more than wired because it does not require >>> physical access. >> >> Oh for pete's sake..... Someone is worried about efficiency >> enough to think about abandoning Samba for some supposed slight >> advantage of nfs and you propose adding an encryption layer in >> there? >> >> Network security should be handled at the network level not the >> file system level. > > > And if he's using 802.11x, he should at least have WEP, if not WPA, > enabled I use WEP so I'm happy with that. Adding an encrypted file system = more data to transmit = slower performance. Dave -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCWNo9Tvi0LnvdKq0RAiAIAJ9HWT5ITaMyuc3qN9SHs1H6pR7kpACgmsZi U9FtDlrJpKRANpEtRRAITxU= =IUon -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ mythtv-users mailing list mythtv-users@mythtv.org http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
