[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 04.01.2006 18:10:54: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [~]# rpm -i nagios-1.2-2.1.el3.rf.i386.rpm > > Gives the following reult: > > warning: nagios-1.2-2.1.el3.rf.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID
> 6b8d79e6 > package nagios-1.2-2.1.el3.rf is already installed > > But when i do > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [~]# rpm -q nagios-1.2-2.1.el3.rf.i386.rpm > > I get: > package nagios-1.2-2.1.el3.rf.i386.rpm is not installed > > What am i doing wrong? > > Thanks in advance for the help. man rpm "rpm -q" takes the NAME of the paket as parameter, not the filename. So in your case it would be: "rpm -q nagios" or "rpm -q nagios-1.2", I'm unsure if they took the version number into the paketname since there's 1.2 and 2.0 out. But I fail to see why you want to use nagios 1.2 instead of 2.0. It's more or less outdated. regards sash PS: I suggest that you make yourself familiar with RedHat and/or Linux in general first before trying to install such a huge beast like Nagios. -------------------------------------------------- Sascha Runschke Netzwerk Administration IT-Services ABIT AG Robert-Bosch-Str. 1 40668 Meerbusch Tel.:+49 (0) 2150.9153.226 Mobil:+49 (0) 173.5419665 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.abit.net http://www.abit-epos.net --------------------------------- Sicherheitshinweis zur E-Mail Kommunikation / Security note regarding email communication: http://www.abit.net/sicherheitshinweis.html ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null