Hi Eric, Ok, My Bad.
Not sure this cures everything but have you read and distilled the following 2 sections from Nagios "Theory of operation"? Determine status and reachability of network hosts Network outages Hope that helps, And if it doesn't, then im sure some one with much more experience will help ya. Regards Tom -----Original Message----- From: Eric F Crist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 January 2008 16:11 To: Welsh,T,Tom,DLS2 C Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] nagios and parenting... Tom, Thanks for the reply, but my original question is not answered by the FAQ you linked. That sorta leads me toward the correct answer to a question I've posted since, but that question was asked in response to someone's reply to my original question. So, apparently I need to re-pose the question I originally asked, since some seem to be confused. In regards to parenting and unreachable notifications, is there any way to tell the nagios process where within the hierarchy it resides, or is this figured out automatically? At least in my mind, I'd need to know where I was on a map to know what was between me and my destination to figure out if the problem was somewhere in between, or with my destination. Thanks. Eric Crist On Jan 15, 2008, at 9:59 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Eric, > > This is a faq question. > > http://www.nagios.org/faqs/viewfaq.php?faq_id=81&expand=false&showdesc > =f > alse > > Regards > > Tom > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric > F Crist > Sent: 15 January 2008 14:31 > To: Patrick Morris > Cc: Nagios List > Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] nagios and parenting... > > On Jan 14, 2008, at 2:40 PM, Patrick Morris wrote: > >> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Eric F Crist wrote: >> >>> Is there any way or any benefit to telling nagios it resides on a >>> particular host? It would appear to me that bit of information >>> would > >>> be necessary to properly handle notifications and parenting. >> >> Assuming you set up your parents correctly (from the perspective of >> Nagios), it'll drop itself into the right place. >> >> And, no, there's no way to tell Nagios whic host it lives on, but >> again, if you set up parents correctly, it won't matter. >> >> Say Nagios lives on Box A, and that box plugs into Switch B. You're >> alos monitoring Box C, also attached to Switch B. >> >> Switch B would have a parent of Box A, and Box C would have a parent >> of Switch B. When you look at the status map after setting that up, >> you'll see Nagios happily hanging itself off Box A, since it's the >> topmost parent of everything else. > > > I think I do have all of the parenting set up correctly, but the > Nagios process appears in the status map in the center, not attached > to anything. Should Nagios be at the top of my parenting chain? > Rather, the nagios host? > > ----- > Eric F Crist > Secure Computing Networks > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > - > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. > Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Nagios-users mailing list > Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users > ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when > reporting any issue. > ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null ----- Eric F Crist Secure Computing Networks ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null