[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/12/2008 10:06:16 > AM: > >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users- >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 9:39 AM >>> To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>> Subject: [Nagios-users] check_snmp issue >>> >>> >>> Thank you all for the comments on the parenting issue I posted >> yesterday. >>> We have come up with a much easier solution than had been proposed. >> What did you end up with? > > host -> gateway -> router > > Which is actually not much of a change from how we are already doing it. > >>> I am now having an issue with check_snmp. I have used check_snmp to >>> monitor this exact service in the past on other Nagios hosts and am >> using >>> other snmp checks as well from the current host. Here is the problem: >>> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/nagios/libexec> /check_snmp -H peapgse01 >> -o >>> GSA-MIB::crawlRunning.0 -C public -m GSA-MIB -P 2c -d "=" >>> SNMP problem - No data received from host >>> CMD: /usr/bin/snmpget -t 1 -r 5 -m GSA-MIB -v 2c -c public >> peapgse01:161 >>> GSA-MIB::crawlRunning.0 >>> >>> But if I run the command it shows, exactly: >>> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/nagios/libexec> /usr/bin/snmpget -t 1 -r 5 >> -m >>> GSA-MIB -v 2c -c public peapgse01:161 GSA-MIB::crawlRunning.0 >>> GSA-MIB::crawlRunning.0 = INTEGER: Running(1) >> Not a direct answer but to troubleshoot I'd run check_snmp in verbose >> mode (-v). That will cause it to print the output it receives from >> snmpget. You'll at least know then if the problem is with the call to >> snmpget or the parsing of its output. I'd also run 'strace -Ffs512 >> ./check_snmp ...' and look for the sendto and recvfrom lines which would >> be the communication with the remote snmp agent just to verify that >> there is data flowing both ways. I'd also drop the -d "=" since that's >> the default anyway. I'd try using the numeric OID instead of >> GSA-MIB::crawlRunning.0 to eliminate MIB loading/parsing issues. And >> finally, I'd use IP or FQDN for the hostname to eliminate resolution >> issues. >> >> -- >> Marc > > Sometimes you can't see the forest for the trees. It was an MIB issue. > Using the numeric OID gets the result I need. Thank you for the advice. > Taking it step by step solved my issue: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/nagios/libexec> ./check_snmp -v -H peapgse01 > -o .1.3.6.1.4.1.11129.1.1.1.0 -C public -m GSA-MIB -P 2c > /usr/bin/snmpget -t 1 -r 5 -m GSA-MIB -v 2c -c public peapgse01:161 > 1.3.6.1.4.1.11129.1.1.1.0 > iso.3.6.1.4.1.11129.1.1.1.0 = INTEGER: 1 >
You can now also drop "-m GSA-MIB" from the command line. I suspect this problem crops up due to the environment being NULL and nothing when the plugin runs snmpget. Do you have some snmp-specific settings in your environment? -- Andreas Ericsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null